So how much
does our own culture and upbringing influence the way we understand and
interpret the bible?
Here’s a
fun little experiment you can try.
Gather a
bunch of middle-class American Christians together and then divide them into
groups and have them read Luke 15:11-32… Jesus’ parable of the prodigal son.
Then, have each group give a brief summary of the parable.
Then, have each group give a brief summary of the parable.
Pretty easy, right?
However, in most American groups, those retelling the story (to their own shock) will leave out a very important fact…
…the fact that there was a famine!
However, when this experiment was done in Russia, almost everyone mentioned the famine in their brief summary.
So why did the Americans leave out such an important fact?
However, when this experiment was done in Russia, almost everyone mentioned the famine in their brief summary.
So why did the Americans leave out such an important fact?
Because famine is foreign to the experience of most Americans;
whereas most Russians have experienced famine at some point in recent history.
Americans, who tend to think a lot about saving and spending
money… blame the son’s starvation on his waste of his father’s inheritance…
hence the title “prodigal” we’ve attached to him.
However, Russians point out that he was starving because there
was a famine… and the people who first heard this parable would have thought
the same way.
So why do we call the prodigal son… “The prodigal son”? What
makes him a prodigal?
Well… he wasted all his dad’s money on prostitutes and wild
parties, right? That would make him a prodigal, no doubt.
But Jesus never calls him a prodigal. The word prodigal is never
used in the story. It’s just a label that people gave the son later.
So why the label? Do we think we’re better than the son because
we don’t spend all our money on prostitutes and wild parties?
The only reason we attach the prodigal label to him is because
we value good finance and frugality in our culture. We value good use of good
money. Which isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it does get in the way of our
view of the son. We see him as someone who threw away privilege – who wasted
his life… and we’re just a little bit ashamed of him for that.
But that’s not how Jesus sees the son. Jesus sees him as one who
isolated himself from his community of support and lost his way because he
thought he could handle life on his own terms and with his own wisdom… and he
failed. When life got hard, he hit rock bottom.
But Jesus also shows us that God is the loving father who takes
the son back despite his imperfections.
The father doesn’t say, “That prodigal son of mine who wasted
all my money on prostitutes has returned to get more money from me.”
The father says, “My son who was lost has come home! Let’s
celebrate!”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments!